1.Overview 2.Economic Policy 3.Public Finance  
4.Taxation 5.Monetary Policy and the Bank of Japan   6.Trade  
7.Employment   8.Finance   9.Business  
10.Energy   11.Transportation   12.Science & Technology  
13.Information Technology   14.Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing Industries        
2. Economic Policy
Structural Reform
Since assuming office in April 2001, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi has fought for the idea of implementing "structural reforms without sanctuaries" aimed at overhauling Japan's economy, and has formed an agenda including everything from fiscal reform to privatization of governmental corporations, such as Japan Highway Public Corporation (*1) and Japan Post.(*2) Because many of the proposals could hurt vested interests, however, Koizumi is facing increasing resistance from opponents, including bureaucrats and members of his own ruling Liberal Democratic Party.
To achieve his structural reform goals, Koizumi has been making full use of the Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy (CEFP)(*3), a key government panel headed by the prime minister. The council, which is empowered to draw up the national budget, was created through a government reorganization that kicked off in January 2001. As a follow-up to the reform program announced in 2001, the Council finalized the second round of reform policies in June 2002 that proposed a comprehensive review of the tax system and economic revitalization steps, including the creation of special structural reform zones, where businesses would be allowed to operate free from specific regulations.
With the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and its coalition parties having won majority at the lower house election in November 2003, Koizumi reiterated his commitment to structural reform of the economy. The challenges facing him, however, look even greater.
Koizumi wants to see the economy achieve nominal growth of more than 2% by fiscal year 2006, as otherwise the economy will likely not achieve a stable recovery. He has moved ahead with a plan to set up special deregulation zones and cut taxes by ¥1.8 trillion while trimming public-works spending. Such policy measures, which are aimed at stimulating private-sector demand, have produced some results.
However, the banking and non-bank finance companies have yet to be resuscitated. The Financial Services Agency, which oversees financial industry, intends to have banks' non-performing loans halved as a percentage of their outstanding loans by the end of fiscal year 2004. The government in April 2003 established Industrial Revitalization Corp. of Japan (IRCJ)(*4), which is to use ¥10 trillion yen of public funds to purchase problem loans from financial institutions in hopes of reviving the businesses of their nearly 100 corporate borrowers within five years. There is no doubt that the crucial issue for the Japanese economy remains to be whether banks can resolve their bad loans once and for all.

Privatization of Postal Services
One of Koizumi's key structural reform initiatives is the privatization of the postal services, which consist of mail delivery service, postal savings and insurance services. Koizumi has called on the CEFP to discuss and submit a final report on postal privatization by the fall of 2004. The necessary legislation will be submitted during the 2005 regular Diet session and privatization would begin in April 2007, according to a timetable laid out by Koizumi. The primary issue that must be addressed is the loss-stricken structure of mail services. Due to factors such as the proliferation of e-mail, upon the launching of Japan Post in April 2003, these services were already ¥570 billion in deficit. With mail volume handled by the postal service on the decline, outlook of a recovery in earnings remains cloudy. Japan Post President Masaharu Ikuta is showing interest in overseas operations, such as in other Asian countries, as a way to mitigate such losses.
Privatizing the postal savings and life insurance programs will also pose major challenges. If the postal savings system is privatized and existing restrictions on deposits and other areas are lifted, its 24,700 branches nationwide would make it a major force in the finance industry. Some fear that as a privatized entity it could siphon market share from other private-sector financial institutions. The consolidation and closing of certain post office branches will become necessary if it is to create a structure that is capable of generating a profit even in the face of a decline in revenue. But the government decided in October 2003 that it would seek to maintain the present network of post office branches and workers, as it is.